raiprocarhapsie.ga/chat-juegos-de-amor.php How far will WeThink spread? For better or worse? As we may think. He has advised companies, cities and governments around the world, from the BBC and RSC to Vodafone and Microsoft, has won the prestigious David Watt prize for journalism and in was ranked by Accenture as one of the top management thinkers in the world.
In a ways this is the best environment for democracy, because more people will have their voices heard and understood by others. It is good for equality as well because more people will have more access to information or knowledge for free because they are not able to pay for it.
In the s, Charles Leadbeater's prescient book, In Search of Work, anticipated the growth of flexible employment. Now We-think explains how the rise of mass collaboration will affect us and the world in which we live. Charles Leadbeater is one the world's leading authorities on. We-Think is a rallying call for the shared power of the web to make society more open and egalitarian. We-Think: Mass innovation, not mass production.
And more and more people know how to think creatively. It is sound super great, but we still have challenges. How to understand privacy in a common public space, safe sharing, what if wikipedia is a crap, how do we earn a living when everyone is free sharing.
In the past you are what you own, in today's world you are what you share. Good book, recommended to read.
Aug 31, Jesse Biroscak rated it it was amazing. This book on the Sharing Economy doesn't disappoint. I found myself dog-earing and note-taking throughout. There are many lessons and macro concepts that would serve anyone experts, too!
I re-read many of the sections and will likely do so again in the future. For experts, some of it is basic, but there are a TON of interesting concepts that will no doubt enhance your perception of the Sharing Economy and give you ideas on h This book on the Sharing Economy doesn't disappoint. For experts, some of it is basic, but there are a TON of interesting concepts that will no doubt enhance your perception of the Sharing Economy and give you ideas on how we can make it better. If you want to know how the web operates and get an insight into how it could evolve, this is for you.
John Ervin rated it it was amazing Oct 09, Patrick rated it it was amazing Dec 01, Nobel Herrera rated it it was amazing Mar 16, Deby Adair rated it it was amazing Oct 12, Fef rated it it was amazing Feb 26, Jessica Myers rated it it was amazing Sep 16, Muthanna Attyah rated it it was amazing Oct 29, Tom rated it it was amazing Feb 03, Alexander Krastev rated it it was amazing May 14, Scott rated it it was amazing Apr 22, Dominic Jones rated it it was amazing Jul 16, Allison rated it it was amazing Nov 22, Brent rated it it was amazing Mar 18, There is not a massive take away from the book, but it did provide some good reference as to why I am reading and thinking like I do currently.
Lieve Vereycken rated it it was amazing Jan 24, This book is not yet featured on Listopia. It is sound super great, but we still have challenges. We win the recognition that counts from impartial, external sources, usually communities of our peers. Whatever the limitations of top-down, industrial-era institutions, at least the world they created was relatively orderly and people knew where they stood First, those who have top-down control will fight to retain it, even as power threatens to, seep away from them.
This has helped me to structure some very clear views on thouhgs on some projects that I was struggling with so — many thanks. In We-Think, crowds need meeting places, neutral spaces for creative conversation, moderated to allow the free flow of ideas. All of this is encouraging large companies to shift towards more collaborative , networked approaches to innovation to share costs and multiply their source of ideas. It is vital to our psychological well-being that we are held in high esteem, valued and recognised for what we do.
Our identities — what we are good at and what matters to us — depend on the recognition of other people. In the past, certainly in the rich work, many people acquired a sense of identity from their position in a bounded local community.
In the 20th century, occupation and position in an organisational hierarchy often provided the key. Now, people increasingly get a sense of identity from the relationships they form and the interests they share with others. The web matters not least because by allowing people to participate and share, it also give them a route to recognition, if only through the comments posted in response to a blog, a rating as a trader on eBay, the point acquired as a game player, or the incorporations of software they have written into the source code. People are drawn to share, not only to air their ideas, but in the hope their contributions will eb recognised by a community of their peers.
We win the recognition that counts from impartial, external sources, usually communities of our peers. These communities meet a basic human need that will get stronger as we become materially richer. Feeding this development will be a fundamental change in our economic culture: